[Thu May 30 09:07:57 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (236.6, 305.3) = 15 2 50.15 -42 8 39.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 37.9 +/- 10.3
  Background counts = 25.7
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.003

[Thu May 30 09:08:00 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.51'
[Thu May 30 09:09:09 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.68 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 30 09:09:09 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.68"
[Thu May 30 09:09:09 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.003
[Thu May 30 09:09:09 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 94 for pass 0, mean size = 8.68"
[Thu May 30 09:09:13 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 09:09:13 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.csv
[Thu May 30 09:09:13 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 09:09:13 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.csv
[Thu May 30 09:09:13 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 30 09:09:17 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 09:09:17 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94.csv
[Thu May 30 09:09:17 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 09:09:17 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94.csv
[Thu May 30 09:09:17 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 30 09:10:32 2013] Warning, spatial fit 94 centroid is now closest to src. 76
[Thu May 30 09:10:32 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 430.494000, observed total counts = 362.000000
[Thu May 30 09:10:32 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 66
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu May 30 09:10:32 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May 30 09:10:32 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May 30 09:10:32 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May 30 09:10:32 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May 30 09:10:32 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May 30 09:10:32 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9