[Thu May 30 09:07:54 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (346.1, 372.1) = 15 2 7.35 -42 3 58.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 50.2 +/- 13.2
  Background counts = 50.6
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.003

[Thu May 30 09:08:00 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.36'
[Thu May 30 09:09:09 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.61 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 30 09:09:09 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.61"
[Thu May 30 09:09:09 2013] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.226
[Thu May 30 09:09:09 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 86 for pass 0, mean size = 9.61"
[Thu May 30 09:09:13 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src86.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 09:09:13 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src86.csv
[Thu May 30 09:09:13 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src86_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 09:09:13 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src86.csv
[Thu May 30 09:09:13 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src86_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src86.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 30 09:09:17 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src86.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 09:09:17 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src86_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 09:09:17 2013] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src86 appears to have run properly
[Thu May 30 09:10:32 2013] Warning: source 86 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 24 at 11.827305 pixels away
[Thu May 30 09:10:32 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May 30 09:10:32 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May 30 09:10:32 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May 30 09:10:32 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May 30 09:10:32 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May 30 09:11:12 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.61 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 30 09:11:12 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.61"
[Thu May 30 09:11:12 2013] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.226
[Thu May 30 09:11:12 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 64 for pass 1, mean size = 9.61"
[Thu May 30 09:11:16 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 09:11:16 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 09:11:16 2013] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64 appears to have run properly
[Thu May 30 09:11:20 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 09:11:20 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 09:11:20 2013] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64 appears to have run properly
[Thu May 30 09:12:25 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 572.996000, observed total counts = 573.000000
[Thu May 30 09:12:25 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 24 = 1.188845 pixels
[Thu May 30 09:12:25 2013] 574.554300 total counts/ 558.173000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.693368
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 24 = 1.188845 pixels
  Position = (346.0, 370.9) = 15 2 7.37 -42 3 59.7
  Extent = 3.0 (2.4-5.8)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 16.4 +/- 24.0
  Background counts = 558.2
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.006
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability