[Thu May 30 09:07:50 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (254.0, 287.0) = 15 2 43.33 -42 10 3.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 40.8 +/- 11.1
  Background counts = 19.7
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.003

[Thu May 30 09:07:51 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.32'
[Thu May 30 09:09:02 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.09 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 30 09:09:02 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.09"
[Thu May 30 09:09:02 2013] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.718
[Thu May 30 09:09:02 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 95 for pass 0, mean size = 8.09"
[Thu May 30 09:09:06 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 09:09:06 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95.csv
[Thu May 30 09:09:06 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 09:09:06 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95.csv
[Thu May 30 09:09:06 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 30 09:09:09 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 09:09:09 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 09:09:09 2013] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95 appears to have run properly
[Thu May 30 09:09:59 2013] Source 99 is offset by 4.229441 and -0.177714 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.974809 x 0.974809, not incorporating fit results
[Thu May 30 09:09:59 2013] Source 99 is offset by -1.436178 and -8.415920 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.984703 x 0.984703, not incorporating fit results
[Thu May 30 09:09:59 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May 30 09:09:59 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May 30 09:09:59 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May 30 09:09:59 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May 30 09:09:59 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May 30 09:09:59 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0