[Sun Sep 2 10:32:14 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (398.0, 362.5) = 15 3 15.54 -41 43 45.4 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 63.1 +/- 11.6 Background counts = 30.7 Rate = 0.04 +/- 0.006 [Sun Sep 2 10:32:15 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.58' [Sun Sep 2 10:36:30 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.72 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Sep 2 10:36:30 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.72" [Sun Sep 2 10:36:30 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.683 [Sun Sep 2 10:36:30 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 111 for pass 0, mean size = 10.72" [Mon Sep 3 04:47:07 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Sep 3 04:47:07 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Sep 3 04:47:07 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Sep 3 04:47:07 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Sep 3 04:47:07 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Sep 3 04:47:07 2012] Source is confused with source 109 [Mon Sep 3 04:48:01 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.72 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Sep 3 04:48:01 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.72" [Mon Sep 3 04:48:01 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.683 [Mon Sep 3 04:48:01 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 98 for pass 1, mean size = 10.72" [Mon Sep 3 10:59:47 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0111090101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src98.ximg exists [Mon Sep 3 10:59:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111090101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src98.csv [Mon Sep 3 10:59:47 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0111090101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src98_1.ximg exists [Mon Sep 3 10:59:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111090101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src98.csv [Mon Sep 3 10:59:47 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0111090101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src98_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0111090101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src98.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Sep 3 10:59:50 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0111090101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src98.ximg exists [Mon Sep 3 10:59:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111090101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src98.csv [Mon Sep 3 10:59:50 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0111090101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src98_1.ximg exists [Mon Sep 3 10:59:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111090101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src98.csv [Mon Sep 3 10:59:50 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0111090101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src98_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0111090101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src98.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Sep 4 01:00:03 2012] Source 111 is offset by 0.240640 and 3.914153 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.232078 x 1.232078, not incorporating fit results [Tue Sep 4 01:00:03 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Sep 4 01:00:03 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Sep 4 01:00:03 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Sep 4 01:00:03 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Sep 4 01:00:03 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Sep 4 01:00:03 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9