[Tue May 29 11:14:27 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (410.2, 264.2) = 8 34 35.36 -45 11 38.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 369.0 +/- 28.1
  Background counts = 144.2
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.001

[Tue May 29 11:14:27 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.47'
[Tue May 29 14:36:52 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.67 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 29 14:36:52 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Tue May 29 14:36:52 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.67"
[Tue May 29 14:36:52 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 34, frac = 0.976
[Tue May 29 14:36:52 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 0, mean size = 10.67"
[Tue May 29 16:35:35 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111080201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg exists
[Tue May 29 16:35:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111080201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Tue May 29 16:35:35 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111080201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 29 16:35:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111080201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Tue May 29 16:35:35 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0111080201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0111080201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 29 16:35:36 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111080201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Tue May 29 16:35:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111080201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Tue May 29 16:35:36 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111080201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 29 16:35:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111080201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Tue May 29 16:35:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0111080201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0111080201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 29 17:10:03 2012] Warning: source 6 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 5 at 13.177969 pixels away
[Tue May 29 17:10:03 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May 29 17:10:03 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May 29 17:10:03 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May 29 17:10:03 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May 29 17:10:03 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May 29 17:15:21 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.67 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 29 17:15:21 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.67"
[Tue May 29 17:15:21 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 34, frac = 0.976
[Tue May 29 17:15:21 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 10.67"
[Tue May 29 17:32:16 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111080201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg exists
[Tue May 29 17:32:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111080201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Tue May 29 17:32:16 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111080201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 29 17:32:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111080201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Tue May 29 17:32:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0111080201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0111080201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 29 17:32:16 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111080201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Tue May 29 17:32:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111080201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Tue May 29 17:32:16 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111080201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 29 17:32:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111080201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Tue May 29 17:32:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0111080201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0111080201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 29 17:47:10 2012] Warning: source 5 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 5 at 13.177969 pixels away
[Tue May 29 17:47:10 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May 29 17:47:10 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May 29 17:47:10 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May 29 17:47:10 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May 29 17:47:10 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May 29 17:47:10 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9