[Sun Jun  9 18:58:38 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (267.0, 254.9) = 18 22 30.59 64 16 19.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 128.6 +/- 17.7
  Background counts = 99.0
  Rate = 0.1 +/- 0.01

[Sun Jun  9 18:58:39 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.89'
[Sun Jun  9 19:01:40 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.37 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  9 19:01:40 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.37"
[Sun Jun  9 19:01:40 2013] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 19, frac = 0.808
[Sun Jun  9 19:01:40 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 84 for pass 0, mean size = 8.37"
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:17 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:17 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.csv
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:17 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:17 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.csv
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:17 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:20 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84.csv
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:20 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84.csv
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:20 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:10 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 1040.270000, observed total counts = 733.000000
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:10 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 85
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 949.452000, observed total counts = 800.000000
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 85
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:22 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.37 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:22 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.37"
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:22 2013] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 19, frac = 0.808
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:22 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 77 for pass 1, mean size = 8.37"
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:50 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src77.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:50 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src77.csv
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:50 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src77_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:50 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src77.csv
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:50 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src77_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src77.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:52 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src77.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:52 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src77.csv
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:52 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src77_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:52 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src77.csv
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:52 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src77_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src77.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 10 08:01:00 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 942.060000, observed total counts = 800.000000
[Mon Jun 10 08:01:00 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 85
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 10 08:01:00 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 10 08:01:00 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 10 08:01:00 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 10 08:01:00 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 10 08:01:00 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 10 08:01:14 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(23180.502655, 22129.797379, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Mon Jun 10 08:01:14 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src85_src.reg
[Mon Jun 10 08:01:14 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (230, 217) - (305, 292)
[Mon Jun 10 08:01:14 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(23180.502655, 22129.797379, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22820.833801, 21443.691345, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22375.346436, 21867.302597, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23421.430634, 25055.609131, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22354.002655, 22924.966705, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23445.118805, 22837.071960, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21423.675079, 22410.801697, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Mon Jun 10 08:01:14 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src85.gif
[Mon Jun 10 08:41:48 2013] Mean detx,y = (-2706.72, 5895.19) 
[Mon Jun 10 08:41:50 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Mon Jun 10 08:42:09 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Mon Jun 10 08:42:10 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src85_src_b10.pi.gz
[Mon Jun 10 08:42:10 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src85_bgd.pi.gz
[Mon Jun 10 09:51:30 2013] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Mon Jun 10 09:51:30 2013] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Mon Jun 10 10:09:05 2013] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Mon Jun 10 10:09:05 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src85_src_b10.pi.gz = 539.00
[Mon Jun 10 10:09:05 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src85_bgd.pi.gz = 1075.00
[Mon Jun 10 10:09:05 2013] Got source and background scale factors 1038212.000000, 4518879.000000
[Mon Jun 10 10:09:05 2013] User source parameters:
  Position = (267.0, 254.9) = 18 22 30.59 64 16 19.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0
  Source aperture counts = 292.0 +/- 24.2
  Background aperture counts = 247.0
  Rate = 0.6 +/- 0.05

[Mon Jun 10 10:09:05 2013] Updating counts from extracted products
[Mon Jun 10 10:09:05 2013] Set source signif. to 292.02/15.72 = 18.58
[Mon Jun 10 10:09:07 2013] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Mon Jun 10 10:09:07 2013] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.56, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src85.arf
[Mon Jun 10 10:09:07 2013] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Mon Jun 10 10:09:07 2013] Updating source flux to 2.5e-12
[Mon Jun 10 10:09:11 2013] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting
[Mon Jun 10 10:09:19 2013] xmm0110950501/analysis//spectral/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src85_pl.csv not found, spectral fit skipped or did not complete