[Sun Jun 9 18:58:38 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (154.4, 278.5) = 18 23 45.93 64 17 58.3 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 73.7 +/- 15.1 Background counts = 81.3 Rate = 0.04 +/- 0.007 [Sun Jun 9 18:58:39 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.55' [Sun Jun 9 19:01:40 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.70 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Jun 9 19:01:40 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.70" [Sun Jun 9 19:01:40 2013] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 45, frac = 1.106 [Sun Jun 9 19:01:40 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 83 for pass 0, mean size = 11.70" [Mon Jun 10 00:31:17 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src83.ximg exists [Mon Jun 10 00:31:17 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src83.csv [Mon Jun 10 00:31:17 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src83_1.ximg exists [Mon Jun 10 00:31:17 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src83.csv [Mon Jun 10 00:31:17 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src83_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src83.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jun 10 00:31:20 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src83.ximg exists [Mon Jun 10 00:31:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src83.csv [Mon Jun 10 00:31:20 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src83_1.ximg exists [Mon Jun 10 00:31:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src83.csv [Mon Jun 10 00:31:20 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src83_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src83.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 564.021000, observed total counts = 463.000000 [Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 84 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Warning: source 82 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 84 at 10.837555 pixels away [Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Warning, spatial fit 83 centroid is now closest to src. 86 [Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Source is confused with source 83 [Mon Jun 10 00:38:22 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.70 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Jun 10 00:38:22 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.70" [Mon Jun 10 00:38:22 2013] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 45, frac = 1.106 [Mon Jun 10 00:38:22 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 76 for pass 1, mean size = 11.70" [Mon Jun 10 07:53:50 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76.ximg exists [Mon Jun 10 07:53:50 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76.csv [Mon Jun 10 07:53:50 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76_1.ximg exists [Mon Jun 10 07:53:50 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76.csv [Mon Jun 10 07:53:50 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jun 10 07:53:52 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76.ximg exists [Mon Jun 10 07:53:52 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76.csv [Mon Jun 10 07:53:52 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76_1.ximg exists [Mon Jun 10 07:53:52 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76.csv [Mon Jun 10 07:53:52 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jun 10 08:01:00 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 559.082000, observed total counts = 463.000000 [Mon Jun 10 08:01:00 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 84 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Mon Jun 10 08:01:00 2013] Warning, spatial fit 76 centroid is now closest to src. 86 [Mon Jun 10 08:01:00 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Jun 10 08:01:00 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Jun 10 08:01:00 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Jun 10 08:01:00 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Jun 10 08:01:00 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Jun 10 08:01:14 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(13381.348404, 24176.982941, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Mon Jun 10 08:01:14 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src84_src.reg [Mon Jun 10 08:01:14 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (117, 241) - (192, 316) [Mon Jun 10 08:01:14 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(13381.348404, 24176.982941, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(12067.162003, 25431.128510, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(12756.762054, 25091.640533, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(11695.345062, 24912.580048, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(12521.757446, 24513.699066, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(13805.814575, 24221.465302, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(14114.825000, 23923.916400, 1820.232052, 470.556814, 20.950600, X, Y) [Mon Jun 10 08:01:14 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src84.gif [Mon Jun 10 08:41:23 2013] Mean detx,y = (-12398.00, 6656.24) [Mon Jun 10 08:41:25 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Mon Jun 10 08:41:43 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Mon Jun 10 08:41:43 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src84_src_b10.pi.gz [Mon Jun 10 08:41:43 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src84_bgd.pi.gz [Mon Jun 10 09:51:18 2013] Not generating rmf since there are only 73 counts [Mon Jun 10 09:51:18 2013] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Mon Jun 10 10:09:04 2013] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Mon Jun 10 10:09:04 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src84_src_b10.pi.gz = 331.00 [Mon Jun 10 10:09:05 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src84_bgd.pi.gz = 1227.00 [Mon Jun 10 10:09:05 2013] Got source and background scale factors 907468.000000, 2774630.000000 [Mon Jun 10 10:09:05 2013] User source parameters: Position = (154.4, 278.5) = 18 23 45.93 64 17 58.3 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 Source aperture counts = -70.3 +/- 19.2 Background aperture counts = 401.3 Rate = -0.1 +/- 0.04 [Mon Jun 10 10:09:05 2013] Updating counts from extracted products [Mon Jun 10 10:09:05 2013] Set source signif. to -70.30/20.03 = -3.51 [Mon Jun 10 10:09:07 2013] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Mon Jun 10 10:09:07 2013] Using photon index=1.80, rate=-0.135, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src84.arf [Mon Jun 10 10:09:07 2013] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Mon Jun 10 10:09:07 2013] Updated flux is not positive, keeping original flux [Mon Jun 10 10:09:11 2013] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting [Mon Jun 10 10:09:19 2013] xmm0110950501/analysis//spectral/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src84_pl.csv not found, spectral fit skipped or did not complete