[Sun Jun  9 18:58:38 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (264.0, 306.1) = 18 22 32.64 64 19 56.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 99.5 +/- 17.7
  Background counts = 123.4
  Rate = 0.07 +/- 0.01

[Sun Jun  9 18:58:39 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.56'
[Sun Jun  9 19:01:40 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.71 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  9 19:01:40 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.71"
[Sun Jun  9 19:01:40 2013] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.727
[Sun Jun  9 19:01:40 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 73 for pass 0, mean size = 7.71"
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:17 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src73.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:17 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src73.csv
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:17 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src73_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:17 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src73.csv
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:17 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src73_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src73.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:20 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src73.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src73.csv
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:20 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src73_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src73.csv
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:20 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src73_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src73.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 1106.520000, observed total counts = 907.000000
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 74
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:22 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.71 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:22 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.71"
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:22 2013] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.727
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:22 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 66 for pass 1, mean size = 7.71"
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:50 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src66.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:50 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src66.csv
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:50 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src66_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:50 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src66.csv
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:50 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src66_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src66.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:52 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src66.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:52 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src66.csv
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:52 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src66_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:52 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src66.csv
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:52 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src66_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src66.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 10 08:01:00 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 1147.970000, observed total counts = 1142.000000
[Mon Jun 10 08:01:00 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 74 = 1.754992 pixels
[Mon Jun 10 08:01:00 2013] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 66 to 59
[Mon Jun 10 08:01:00 2013] 1127.331500 total counts/ 1110.420000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.507503
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 74 = 1.754992 pixels
  Position = (262.4, 306.7) = 18 22 33.75 64 20 4.8
  Extent = 3.7 (2.0-9.8)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 16.9 +/- 33.6
  Background counts = 1110.4
  Rate = 0.03 +/- 0.06
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability