[Sun Jun  9 18:58:38 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (273.6, 304.0) = 18 22 26.21 64 19 54.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 112.7 +/- 19.4
  Background counts = 113.6
  Rate = 0.07 +/- 0.01

[Sun Jun  9 18:58:39 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.84'
[Sun Jun  9 19:01:40 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.35 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  9 19:01:40 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.35"
[Sun Jun  9 19:01:40 2013] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.043
[Sun Jun  9 19:01:40 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 71 for pass 0, mean size = 7.35"
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:17 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:17 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71.csv
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:17 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:17 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71.csv
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:17 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:20 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71.csv
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:20 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71.csv
[Mon Jun 10 00:31:20 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Warning, spatial fit 71 centroid is now closest to src. 71
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:11 2013] Source is confused with source 75
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:22 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.35 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:22 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.35"
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:22 2013] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.043
[Mon Jun 10 00:38:22 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 64 for pass 1, mean size = 7.35"
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:50 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:50 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64.csv
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:50 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:50 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64.csv
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:50 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:52 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:52 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64.csv
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:52 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:52 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64.csv
[Mon Jun 10 07:53:52 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 10 08:01:00 2013] Warning, spatial fit 64 centroid is now closest to src. 71
[Mon Jun 10 08:01:00 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 1061.370000, observed total counts = 974.000000
[Mon Jun 10 08:01:00 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 72 = 0.377444 pixels
[Mon Jun 10 08:01:00 2013] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 64 to 67
[Mon Jun 10 08:01:00 2013] 1046.957500 total counts/ 1035.390000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.359491
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 72 = 0.377444 pixels
  Position = (273.9, 304.2) = 18 22 25.99 64 19 54.0
  Extent = 3.1 (1.8-14.4)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 11.6 +/- 32.4
  Background counts = 1035.4
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.06
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability