[Tue Mar 13 02:46:08 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (235.4, 397.2) = 0 47 50.45 -25 8 42.1 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 54.8 +/- 9.9 Background counts = 10.9 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003 [Tue Mar 13 02:46:12 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.50' [Tue Mar 13 02:46:57 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.68 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Mar 13 02:46:57 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.68" [Tue Mar 13 02:46:57 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.031 [Tue Mar 13 02:46:57 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 53 for pass 0, mean size = 10.68" [Tue Mar 13 02:46:59 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src53.ximg exists [Tue Mar 13 02:46:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src53.csv [Tue Mar 13 02:46:59 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src53_1.ximg exists [Tue Mar 13 02:46:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src53.csv [Tue Mar 13 02:46:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src53_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src53.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Mar 13 02:47:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src53.ximg exists [Tue Mar 13 02:47:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src53_1.ximg exists [Tue Mar 13 02:47:00 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0110900101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src53 appears to have run properly [Tue Mar 13 02:47:41 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 191.103000, observed total counts = 189.000000 [Tue Mar 13 02:47:41 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 23 = 0.111385 pixels [Tue Mar 13 02:47:41 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 53 to 26 [Tue Mar 13 02:47:41 2012] 191.265600 total counts/ 161.715000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.323759 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 23 = 0.111385 pixels Position = (235.4, 397.4) = 0 47 50.46 -25 8 42.8 Extent = 4.2 (3.2-5.8)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 29.6 +/- 13.8 Background counts = 161.7 Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0005 [Tue Mar 13 02:47:41 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 189.842000, observed total counts = 191.000000 [Tue Mar 13 02:47:41 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 23 = 0.039194 pixels [Tue Mar 13 02:47:41 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 26 to 53 [Tue Mar 13 02:47:41 2012] 191.589100 total counts/ 160.302000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.471131 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 23 = 0.039194 pixels Position = (235.4, 397.4) = 0 47 50.47 -25 8 42.7 Extent = 4.3 (3.3-5.9)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 31.3 +/- 13.8 Background counts = 160.3 Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0005 [Tue Mar 13 02:47:41 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Mar 13 02:47:41 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Mar 13 02:47:41 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound [Tue Mar 13 02:47:41 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Mar 13 02:47:41 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Mar 13 02:47:41 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9