[Wed May 22 07:13:03 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (210.6, 336.1) = 0 53 55.82 12 45 28.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 69.0 +/- 10.6
  Background counts = 7.3
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0007

[Wed May 22 07:13:03 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.93'
[Wed May 22 07:50:00 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.89 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 22 07:50:00 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.89"
[Wed May 22 07:50:00 2013] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.975
[Wed May 22 07:50:00 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 9.89"
[Wed May 22 08:19:16 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110890301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 08:19:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110890301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Wed May 22 08:19:16 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110890301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 08:19:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110890301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Wed May 22 08:19:16 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0110890301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0110890301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 22 08:19:16 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110890301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 08:19:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110890301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Wed May 22 08:19:16 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110890301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 08:19:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110890301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Wed May 22 08:19:16 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0110890301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0110890301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 22 09:03:38 2013] Warning: source 5 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 5 at 12.709170 pixels away
[Wed May 22 09:03:38 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 22 09:03:38 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 22 09:03:38 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May 22 09:03:38 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 22 09:03:38 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 22 09:09:19 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.89 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 22 09:09:19 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.89"
[Wed May 22 09:09:19 2013] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.975
[Wed May 22 09:09:19 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 1, mean size = 9.89"
[Wed May 22 09:16:48 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110890301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 09:16:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110890301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Wed May 22 09:16:48 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110890301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 09:16:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110890301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Wed May 22 09:16:48 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0110890301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0110890301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 22 09:16:48 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110890301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 09:16:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110890301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Wed May 22 09:16:48 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110890301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 09:16:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110890301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Wed May 22 09:16:48 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0110890301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0110890301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 22 09:23:06 2013] Warning: source 4 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 5 at 12.531597 pixels away
[Wed May 22 09:23:06 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 22 09:23:06 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 22 09:23:06 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May 22 09:23:06 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 22 09:23:06 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 22 09:23:06 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8