[Sun May 20 10:45:45 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (272.0, 378.9) = 11 24 42.25 -59 11 23.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 110.9 +/- 21.1
  Background counts = 138.5
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.002

[Sun May 20 10:45:46 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.14'
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.50 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.50"
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.250
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 66 for pass 0, mean size = 9.50"
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src66.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src66.csv
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src66_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src66.csv
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src66_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src66.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 21 17:10:27 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src66.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:27 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src66_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:27 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src66 appears to have run properly
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2426.350000, observed total counts = 2445.000000
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 65 = 4.943388 pixels
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 66 to 59
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] 2278.778000 total counts/ 1815.350000 bgd. counts: snr = 10.876824
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 65 = 4.943388 pixels
  Position = (270.3, 383.5) = 11 24 43.20 -59 11 7.3
  Extent = 18.7 (18.6-37.3)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 463.4 +/- 47.7
  Background counts = 1815.3
  Rate = 0.04 +/- 0.004
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Source is confused with source 58
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 18.66"
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] source mask rpix=4.3, npix_max = 91, mask sum = 90, frac = 0.981
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 59 for pass 1, mean size = 18.66"
[Tue May 22 21:22:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src59.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src59_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:42 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src59 appears to have run properly
[Tue May 22 21:22:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:45 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59 appears to have run properly
[Tue May 22 21:23:04 2012] Warning, spatial fit 8 centroid is now closest to src. 10
[Tue May 22 21:23:04 2012] Warning, spatial fit 10 centroid is now closest to src. 10
[Tue May 22 21:23:04 2012] Warning, spatial fit 16 centroid is now closest to src. 41
[Tue May 22 21:23:04 2012] Warning, spatial fit 41 centroid is now closest to src. 25
[Tue May 22 21:23:04 2012] Warning, spatial fit 49 centroid is now closest to src. 23
[Tue May 22 21:23:24 2012] Warning, spatial fit 13 centroid is now closest to src. 27
[Tue May 22 21:23:24 2012] Warning, spatial fit 32 centroid is now closest to src. 32
[Tue May 22 21:23:24 2012] Warning, spatial fit 50 centroid is now closest to src. 31
[Tue May 22 21:23:45 2012] Warning, spatial fit 15 centroid is now closest to src. 36
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Warning, spatial fit 39 centroid is now closest to src. 39
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Warning, spatial fit 42 centroid is now closest to src. 6
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Warning, spatial fit 46 centroid is now closest to src. 44
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Warning, spatial fit 51 centroid is now closest to src. 22
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Warning, spatial fit 54 centroid is now closest to src. 50
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source 65 is offset by -2.693756 and 5.829586 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 6.871632 x 1.956046, not incorporating fit results
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Warning, spatial fit 59 centroid is now closest to src. 57
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00