[Sun May 20 10:45:45 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (274.4, 374.7) = 11 24 40.87 -59 11 45.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 187.1 +/- 24.8
  Background counts = 154.8
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Sun May 20 10:45:46 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.80'
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.33 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.33"
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.894
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 59 for pass 0, mean size = 9.33"
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59.csv
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59.csv
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 21 17:10:27 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src59.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:27 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src59_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:27 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src59 appears to have run properly
[Mon May 21 17:11:33 2012] Warning: source 29 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 58 at 11.840497 pixels away
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Warning, spatial fit 59 centroid is now closest to src. 65
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1199.350000, observed total counts = 1195.000000
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 58 = 0.415873 pixels
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 59 to 66
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] 1154.984000 total counts/ 925.594000 bgd. counts: snr = 7.539876
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 58 = 0.415873 pixels
  Position = (274.3, 374.3) = 11 24 40.91 -59 11 47.3
  Extent = 19.0 (19.0-19.0)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 229.4 +/- 34.0
  Background counts = 925.6
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.003
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Source is confused with source 45
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Source is confused with source 65
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 18.98"
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] source mask rpix=4.4, npix_max = 94, mask sum = 100, frac = 1.057
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 57 for pass 1, mean size = 18.98"
[Tue May 22 21:22:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57.csv
[Tue May 22 21:22:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57.csv
[Tue May 22 21:22:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 22 21:22:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57.csv
[Tue May 22 21:22:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57.csv
[Tue May 22 21:22:45 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Warning, spatial fit 57 centroid is now closest to src. 65
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00