[Sun May 20 10:45:44 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (247.2, 299.7) = 11 24 56.32 -59 17 5.1 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 256.4 +/- 26.3 Background counts = 159.2 Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.002 [Sun May 20 10:45:46 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.71' [Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.28 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.28" [Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 21, frac = 0.908 [Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 56 for pass 0, mean size = 8.28" [Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src56.ximg exists [Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src56.csv [Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src56_1.ximg exists [Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src56.csv [Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src56_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src56.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon May 21 17:10:27 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src56.ximg exists [Mon May 21 17:10:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src56.csv [Mon May 21 17:10:27 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src56_1.ximg exists [Mon May 21 17:10:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src56.csv [Mon May 21 17:10:27 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src56_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src56.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Warning: source 56 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 50 at 10.710352 pixels away [Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Source is confused with source 20 [Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.28 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.28" [Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 21, frac = 0.908 [Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 54 for pass 1, mean size = 8.28" [Tue May 22 21:22:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src54.ximg exists [Tue May 22 21:22:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src54_1.ximg exists [Tue May 22 21:22:42 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src54 appears to have run properly [Tue May 22 21:22:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54.ximg exists [Tue May 22 21:22:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54.csv [Tue May 22 21:22:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54_1.ximg exists [Tue May 22 21:22:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54.csv [Tue May 22 21:22:45 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 22 21:23:45 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 16139.900000, observed total counts = 16016.000000 [Tue May 22 21:23:45 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 50 = 9.378053 pixels [Tue May 22 21:23:45 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 54 to 20 [Tue May 22 21:23:45 2012] 17195.140000 total counts/ 15390.600000 bgd. counts: snr = 14.545838 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 50 = 9.378053 pixels Position = (238.3, 296.9) = 11 25 1.42 -59 17 24.0 Extent = 32.0 (32.0-64.0)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 1804.5 +/- 131.1 Background counts = 15390.6 Rate = 0.1 +/- 0.01 [Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2919.370000, observed total counts = 2962.000000 [Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 50 = 3.972066 pixels [Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 20 to 54 [Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] 2476.640800 total counts/ 2379.380000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.993912 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 50 = 3.972066 pixels Position = (240.9, 293.9) = 11 24 59.95 -59 17 37.1 Extent = 13.3 (13.3-26.6)" x 10.5 (9.6-10.9)", rotation angle = 90 Source counts = 97.3 +/- 49.8 Background counts = 2379.4 Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.004 [Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound [Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 1.22 [Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8