[Sun May 20 10:45:44 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (243.9, 333.8) = 11 24 58.20 -59 14 46.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 993.2 +/- 47.1
  Background counts = 196.1
  Rate = 0.07 +/- 0.004

[Sun May 20 10:45:46 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.72'
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.79 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.79"
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 18, frac = 0.709
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 50 for pass 0, mean size = 8.79"
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50.csv
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50.csv
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 21 17:10:27 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50.csv
[Mon May 21 17:10:27 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50.csv
[Mon May 21 17:10:27 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 21 17:11:33 2012] Source 47 is offset by 7.797415 and -0.091544 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.990349 x 0.990349, not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 21 17:11:33 2012] Source 47 is offset by 7.682059 and -5.698532 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 5.508184 x 8.079219, not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Source 47 is offset by -6.304906 and -5.834325 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 5.481104 x 5.481104, not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.79 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.79"
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 18, frac = 0.709
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 48 for pass 1, mean size = 8.79"
[Tue May 22 21:22:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src48.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src48.csv
[Tue May 22 21:22:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src48_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src48.csv
[Tue May 22 21:22:41 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src48_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src48.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 22 21:22:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src48.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src48.csv
[Tue May 22 21:22:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src48_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src48.csv
[Tue May 22 21:22:45 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src48_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src48.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 4413.110000, observed total counts = 5682.000000
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 47
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00