[Sun May 20 10:45:44 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (308.0, 279.1) = 11 24 21.85 -59 18 41.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 1879.5 +/- 60.8
  Background counts = 181.8
  Rate = 0.1 +/- 0.004

[Sun May 20 10:45:46 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.56'
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.21 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.21"
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.859
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 45 for pass 0, mean size = 7.21"
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src45.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src45.csv
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src45_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src45.csv
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src45_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src45.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 21 17:10:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:26 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45 appears to have run properly
[Mon May 21 17:11:33 2012] Source 44 is offset by -5.670800 and 5.737939 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.828694 x 0.828694, not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Source 44 is offset by -0.382339 and 6.046192 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 7.062207 x 4.151866, not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.21 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.21"
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.859
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 43 for pass 1, mean size = 7.21"
[Tue May 22 21:22:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43.csv
[Tue May 22 21:22:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43.csv
[Tue May 22 21:22:41 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 22 21:22:44 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:44 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:44 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43 appears to have run properly
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Warning, spatial fit 43 centroid is now closest to src. 24
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source 44 is offset by 4.536786 and -8.051234 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 3.062795 x 3.062795, not incorporating fit results
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2226.900000, observed total counts = 2228.000000
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 44 = 6.105031 pixels
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 43 to 58
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] 2193.388000 total counts/ 1610.170000 bgd. counts: snr = 14.534331
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 44 = 6.105031 pixels
  Position = (307.1, 273.1) = 11 24 22.33 -59 19 7.9
  Extent = 15.4 (15.3-30.7)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 583.2 +/- 46.8
  Background counts = 1610.2
  Rate = 0.05 +/- 0.004
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source is confused with source 55
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source is confused with source 60