[Sun May 20 10:45:41 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (296.0, 315.3) = 11 24 28.64 -59 16 0.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 8495.2 +/- 113.7
  Background counts = 334.1
  Rate = 0.5 +/- 0.007

[Sun May 20 10:45:46 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.23'
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.05 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.05"
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.890
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 0, mean size = 7.05"
[Mon May 21 17:10:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:23 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4 appears to have run properly
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 21 17:11:33 2012] Warning, spatial fit 4 centroid is now closest to src. 17
[Mon May 21 17:11:33 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 24302.800000, observed total counts = 21575.000000
[Mon May 21 17:11:33 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 3
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Source is confused with source 15
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.05 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.05"
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.890
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 1, mean size = 7.05"
[Tue May 22 21:22:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Tue May 22 21:22:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Tue May 22 21:22:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 22 21:22:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Tue May 22 21:22:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Tue May 22 21:22:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 22 21:23:45 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 26928.800000, observed total counts = 24257.000000
[Tue May 22 21:23:45 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 3
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00