[Sun May 20 10:45:42 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (288.7, 316.7) = 11 24 32.76 -59 15 53.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 5640.4 +/- 102.6
  Background counts = 340.0
  Rate = 0.4 +/- 0.007

[Sun May 20 10:45:46 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.50'
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.18 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.18"
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.865
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 0, mean size = 7.18"
[Mon May 21 17:10:24 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:24 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:24 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14 appears to have run properly
[Mon May 21 17:10:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Mon May 21 17:10:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Mon May 21 17:10:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 21 17:11:33 2012] Warning, spatial fit 14 centroid is now closest to src. 10
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Source is confused with source 2
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.18 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.18"
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.865
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 1, mean size = 7.18"
[Tue May 22 21:22:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.csv
[Tue May 22 21:22:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.csv
[Tue May 22 21:22:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 22 21:22:43 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Tue May 22 21:22:43 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Tue May 22 21:22:43 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 22 21:23:45 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 27632.000000, observed total counts = 24688.000000
[Tue May 22 21:23:45 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 15
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00