[Sun May 20 10:45:42 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (263.0, 319.0) = 11 24 47.36 -59 15 46.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 6769.1 +/- 106.7
  Background counts = 288.3
  Rate = 0.4 +/- 0.007

[Sun May 20 10:45:46 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.97'
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.91 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.91"
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.744
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 7.91"
[Mon May 21 17:10:24 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Mon May 21 17:10:24 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Mon May 21 17:10:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 21 17:11:33 2012] Warning, spatial fit 9 centroid is now closest to src. 20
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.91 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.91"
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.744
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 1, mean size = 7.91"
[Tue May 22 21:22:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.csv
[Tue May 22 21:22:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.csv
[Tue May 22 21:22:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 22 21:22:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.csv
[Tue May 22 21:22:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.csv
[Tue May 22 21:22:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 22 21:23:45 2012] Warning, spatial fit 8 centroid is now closest to src. 21
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source is confused with source 1