[Sun May 20 10:45:41 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (244.2, 325.0) = 11 24 58.01 -59 15 21.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 4116.1 +/- 80.7
  Background counts = 196.8
  Rate = 0.3 +/- 0.006

[Sun May 20 10:45:46 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.37'
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.62 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.62"
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.016
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 0, mean size = 8.62"
[Mon May 21 17:10:24 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.csv
[Mon May 21 17:10:24 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.csv
[Mon May 21 17:10:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 21 17:10:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Mon May 21 17:10:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 17:10:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Mon May 21 17:10:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 21 17:11:33 2012] Warning, spatial fit 16 centroid is now closest to src. 47
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.62 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.62"
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.016
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 1, mean size = 8.62"
[Tue May 22 21:22:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Tue May 22 21:22:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Tue May 22 21:22:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 22 21:22:43 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Tue May 22 21:22:43 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 21:22:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Tue May 22 21:22:43 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 22 21:23:45 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 9883.370000, observed total counts = 8678.000000
[Tue May 22 21:23:45 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 11
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00