[Sun May 20 10:45:41 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (271.9, 318.0) = 11 24 42.29 -59 15 51.3 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 8703.7 +/- 118.1 Background counts = 318.4 Rate = 0.5 +/- 0.007 [Sun May 20 10:45:46 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.39' [Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.62 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.62" [Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.789 [Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 7.62" [Mon May 21 17:10:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists [Mon May 21 17:10:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv [Mon May 21 17:10:24 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists [Mon May 21 17:10:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv [Mon May 21 17:10:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists [Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv [Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists [Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv [Mon May 21 17:10:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon May 21 17:11:33 2012] Warning, spatial fit 5 centroid is now closest to src. 18 [Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon May 21 17:11:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.62 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.62" [Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.789 [Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 7.62" [Tue May 22 21:22:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg exists [Tue May 22 21:22:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg exists [Tue May 22 21:22:40 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5 appears to have run properly [Tue May 22 21:22:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists [Tue May 22 21:22:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv [Tue May 22 21:22:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists [Tue May 22 21:22:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv [Tue May 22 21:22:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 22 21:23:45 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 24710.600000, observed total counts = 25230.000000 [Tue May 22 21:23:45 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 1 = 4.393390 pixels Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 1 = 4.393390 pixels Position = (273.1, 313.8) = 11 24 41.64 -59 16 10.8 Extent = 29.2" x 29.2", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 24990.4 +/- 158.1 Background counts = 0.0 Rate = 2 +/- 0.01 [Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source is confused with source 2 [Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source is confused with source 18 [Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source is confused with source 14 [Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source is confused with source 15 [Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source is confused with source 9 [Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source is confused with source 21 [Tue May 22 21:23:46 2012] Source is confused with source 40