[Sun May 20 10:44:43 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (296.9, 272.0) = 11 24 28.16 -59 19 11.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 1072.4 +/- 46.4
  Background counts = 149.6
  Rate = 0.07 +/- 0.003

[Sun May 20 10:44:45 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.92'
[Sun May 20 17:47:53 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.39 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 20 17:47:53 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.39"
[Sun May 20 17:47:53 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.828
[Sun May 20 17:47:53 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 45 for pass 0, mean size = 7.39"
[Mon May 21 07:12:04 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src45.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 07:12:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src45.csv
[Mon May 21 07:12:04 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src45_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 07:12:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src45.csv
[Mon May 21 07:12:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src45_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src45.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45 appears to have run properly
[Mon May 21 17:11:10 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3335.520000, observed total counts = 3326.000000
[Mon May 21 17:11:10 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 54 = 0.621136 pixels
[Mon May 21 17:11:10 2012] 3416.532000 total counts/ 3027.620000 bgd. counts: snr = 7.068067
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 54 = 0.621136 pixels
  Position = (296.7, 271.4) = 11 24 28.25 -59 19 15.0
  Extent = 7.6 (6.8-8.8)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 388.9 +/- 58.5
  Background counts = 3027.6
  Rate = 0.03 +/- 0.005
[Mon May 21 17:11:11 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1872.810000, observed total counts = 1877.000000
[Mon May 21 17:11:11 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 54 = 0.236546 pixels
[Mon May 21 17:11:11 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 45 to 61
[Mon May 21 17:11:11 2012] 1895.713000 total counts/ 1428.530000 bgd. counts: snr = 12.360680
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 54 = 0.236546 pixels
  Position = (296.7, 271.7) = 11 24 28.23 -59 19 13.9
  Extent = 9.4 (8.1-11.1)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 467.2 +/- 43.5
  Background counts = 1428.5
  Rate = 0.04 +/- 0.004
[Mon May 21 17:11:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 21 17:11:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 21 17:11:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Mon May 21 17:11:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 21 17:11:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May 22 06:51:16 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 22 06:51:16 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.36"
[Tue May 22 06:51:16 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.889
[Tue May 22 06:51:16 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 44 for pass 1, mean size = 9.36"
[Tue May 22 13:06:29 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src44.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 13:06:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src44.csv
[Tue May 22 13:06:29 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src44_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 13:06:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src44.csv
[Tue May 22 13:06:29 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src44_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src44.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src44.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src44_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src44 appears to have run properly
[Tue May 22 21:23:24 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3423.410000, observed total counts = 3420.000000
[Tue May 22 21:23:24 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 54 = 0.244952 pixels
[Tue May 22 21:23:24 2012] 3411.996000 total counts/ 3014.500000 bgd. counts: snr = 7.239776
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 54 = 0.244952 pixels
  Position = (296.7, 271.4) = 11 24 28.23 -59 19 15.0
  Extent = 7.7 (6.8-8.9)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 397.5 +/- 58.4
  Background counts = 3014.5
  Rate = 0.03 +/- 0.005
[Tue May 22 21:23:24 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May 22 21:23:24 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May 22 21:23:24 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Tue May 22 21:23:24 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May 22 21:23:24 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00