[Sun May 20 10:44:43 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (235.6, 315.1) = 11 25 2.90 -59 16 3.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 282.3 +/- 25.3
  Background counts = 127.1
  Rate = 0.03 +/- 0.002

[Sun May 20 10:44:45 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.71'
[Sun May 20 17:47:53 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.78 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 20 17:47:53 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.78"
[Sun May 20 17:47:53 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.630
[Sun May 20 17:47:53 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 54 for pass 0, mean size = 8.78"
[Mon May 21 07:12:04 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 07:12:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54.csv
[Mon May 21 07:12:04 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 07:12:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54.csv
[Mon May 21 07:12:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 07:12:06 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54 appears to have run properly
[Mon May 21 17:11:11 2012] Source 49 is offset by 3.148322 and 3.760641 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.009683 x 1.009683, not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 21 17:11:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 21 17:11:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 21 17:11:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 21 17:11:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 21 17:11:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May 22 06:51:16 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.78 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 22 06:51:16 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.78"
[Tue May 22 06:51:16 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.630
[Tue May 22 06:51:16 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 52 for pass 1, mean size = 8.78"
[Tue May 22 13:06:29 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src52.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 13:06:29 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src52_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 13:06:30 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src52 appears to have run properly
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src52.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src52_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 22 13:06:32 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0110012701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src52 appears to have run properly
[Tue May 22 21:23:24 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1433.570000, observed total counts = 1502.000000
[Tue May 22 21:23:24 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 49 = 2.216526 pixels
[Tue May 22 21:23:24 2012] 1504.866600 total counts/ 1452.530000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.373229
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 49 = 2.216526 pixels
  Position = (237.3, 313.6) = 11 25 1.96 -59 16 11.1
  Extent = 3.7 (2.2-5.5)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 52.3 +/- 38.8
  Background counts = 1452.5
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.003
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability