[Sun May 20 17:22:47 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (261.3, 372.8) = 23 23 25.23 58 53 22.1 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 241.8 +/- 27.9 Background counts = 149.8 Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.001 [Sun May 20 17:22:50 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.03' [Sun May 20 17:41:00 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.44 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun May 20 17:41:00 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.44" [Sun May 20 17:41:00 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.876 [Sun May 20 17:41:00 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 39 for pass 0, mean size = 9.44" [Tue May 22 06:13:41 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src39.ximg exists [Tue May 22 06:13:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src39.csv [Tue May 22 06:13:41 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src39_1.ximg exists [Tue May 22 06:13:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src39.csv [Tue May 22 06:13:41 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src39_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src39.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 22 06:13:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src39.ximg exists [Tue May 22 06:13:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src39_1.ximg exists [Tue May 22 06:13:43 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src39 appears to have run properly [Wed May 23 02:26:24 2012] Warning, spatial fit 39 centroid is now closest to src. 54 [Wed May 23 02:26:24 2012] Source 39 is offset by 3.457102 and -1.197549 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 2.895430 x 2.895430, not incorporating fit results [Wed May 23 02:26:24 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed May 23 02:26:24 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed May 23 02:26:24 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed May 23 02:26:24 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed May 23 02:26:24 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed May 23 02:27:00 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.44 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed May 23 02:27:00 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.44" [Wed May 23 02:27:00 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.876 [Wed May 23 02:27:00 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 34 for pass 1, mean size = 9.44" [Thu May 24 17:33:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src34.ximg exists [Thu May 24 17:33:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src34_1.ximg exists [Thu May 24 17:33:40 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src34 appears to have run properly [Thu May 24 17:33:41 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src34.ximg exists [Thu May 24 17:33:41 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src34_1.ximg exists [Thu May 24 17:33:41 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src34 appears to have run properly [Fri May 25 18:20:42 2012] Warning, spatial fit 34 centroid is now closest to src. 26 [Fri May 25 18:20:42 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri May 25 18:20:42 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri May 25 18:20:42 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Fri May 25 18:20:42 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Fri May 25 18:20:42 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri May 25 18:20:42 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9