[Sun May 20 17:23:51 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (258.0, 298.0) = 23 23 27.02 58 47 57.3 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 44804.2 +/- 260.4 Background counts = 322.0 Rate = 3 +/- 0.02 [Sun May 20 17:23:52 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.93' [Tue May 22 09:22:28 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.89 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 22 09:22:28 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.89" [Tue May 22 09:22:28 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.746 [Tue May 22 09:22:28 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 0, mean size = 7.89" [Wed May 23 02:25:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg exists [Wed May 23 02:25:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv [Wed May 23 02:25:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg exists [Wed May 23 02:25:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv [Wed May 23 02:25:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed May 23 02:25:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists [Wed May 23 02:25:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.csv [Wed May 23 02:25:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists [Wed May 23 02:25:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.csv [Wed May 23 02:25:57 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed May 23 02:26:44 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 268305.000000, observed total counts = 167832.000000 [Wed May 23 02:26:44 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 15 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Wed May 23 02:26:44 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed May 23 02:26:44 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed May 23 02:26:44 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed May 23 02:26:44 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed May 23 02:26:44 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Thu May 24 19:15:48 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.89 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu May 24 19:15:48 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.89" [Thu May 24 19:15:48 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.746 [Thu May 24 19:15:48 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 1, mean size = 7.89" [Fri May 25 18:20:31 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg exists [Fri May 25 18:20:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv [Fri May 25 18:20:31 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg exists [Fri May 25 18:20:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv [Fri May 25 18:20:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri May 25 18:20:32 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists [Fri May 25 18:20:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv [Fri May 25 18:20:32 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists [Fri May 25 18:20:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv [Fri May 25 18:20:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri May 25 18:20:47 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 268614.000000, observed total counts = 167832.000000 [Fri May 25 18:20:47 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 15 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Fri May 25 18:20:47 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri May 25 18:20:47 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri May 25 18:20:47 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Fri May 25 18:20:47 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Fri May 25 18:20:47 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00