[Sun May 20 17:23:19 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (283.2, 318.3) = 23 23 12.90 58 49 26.8 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 49796.4 +/- 260.9 Background counts = 63.5 Rate = 3 +/- 0.01 [Sun May 20 17:23:21 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.82' [Tue May 22 06:13:44 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.34 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 22 06:13:44 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.34" [Tue May 22 06:13:44 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.046 [Tue May 22 06:13:44 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 0, mean size = 7.34" [Tue May 22 09:22:26 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.ximg exists [Tue May 22 09:22:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.csv [Tue May 22 09:22:26 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg exists [Tue May 22 09:22:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.csv [Tue May 22 09:22:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 22 09:22:27 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists [Tue May 22 09:22:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv [Tue May 22 09:22:27 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists [Tue May 22 09:22:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv [Tue May 22 09:22:27 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed May 23 02:26:35 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 118189.000000, observed total counts = 170529.000000 [Wed May 23 02:26:35 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 6 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Wed May 23 02:26:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed May 23 02:26:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed May 23 02:26:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed May 23 02:26:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed May 23 02:26:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed May 23 02:26:35 2012] Source is confused with source 3 [Thu May 24 17:33:41 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.34 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu May 24 17:33:41 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.34" [Thu May 24 17:33:41 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.046 [Thu May 24 17:33:41 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 1, mean size = 7.34" [Thu May 24 19:15:48 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg exists [Thu May 24 19:15:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv [Thu May 24 19:15:48 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg exists [Thu May 24 19:15:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv [Thu May 24 19:15:48 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu May 24 19:15:48 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists [Thu May 24 19:15:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv [Thu May 24 19:15:48 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists [Thu May 24 19:15:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv [Thu May 24 19:15:48 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0110011001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri May 25 18:20:44 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 267149.000000, observed total counts = 170529.000000 [Fri May 25 18:20:44 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 6 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Fri May 25 18:20:44 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri May 25 18:20:44 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri May 25 18:20:44 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Fri May 25 18:20:44 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Fri May 25 18:20:44 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00