[Sat Jun 22 00:45:35 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (289.3, 275.6) = 14 43 5.43 -62 40 51.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 135.9 +/- 21.3
  Background counts = 221.8
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Sat Jun 22 00:45:39 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.78'
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:45 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.32 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:45 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.32"
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:45 2013] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.050
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:45 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 134 for pass 0, mean size = 7.32"
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:50 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:50 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:50 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:50 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:50 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:50 2013] Source is confused with source 142
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:29 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.32 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:29 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.32"
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:29 2013] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.050
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:29 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 97 for pass 1, mean size = 7.32"
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:35 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:35 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:35 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:35 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:35 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src97.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src97.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src97_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src97.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:42 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src97_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src97.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:37 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 3112.920000, observed total counts = 2251.000000
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:37 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 139
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:38 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:38 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:38 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:38 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:38 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:38 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9