[Sat Jun 22 00:45:34 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (307.2, 293.5) = 14 42 54.14 -62 39 35.2 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 117.9 +/- 26.2 Background counts = 266.5 Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.002 [Sat Jun 22 00:45:39 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.73' [Sat Jun 22 00:47:45 2013] Using EEF radius (= 6.79 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Jun 22 00:47:45 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.79" [Sat Jun 22 00:47:45 2013] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.176 [Sat Jun 22 00:47:45 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 128 for pass 0, mean size = 6.79" [Sat Jun 22 00:48:50 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat Jun 22 00:48:50 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat Jun 22 00:48:50 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Sat Jun 22 00:48:50 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Sat Jun 22 00:48:50 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat Jun 22 00:50:29 2013] Using EEF radius (= 6.79 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Jun 22 00:50:29 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.79" [Sat Jun 22 00:50:29 2013] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.176 [Sat Jun 22 00:50:29 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 95 for pass 1, mean size = 6.79" [Sat Jun 22 00:50:35 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src95.ximg exists [Sat Jun 22 00:50:35 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src95.csv [Sat Jun 22 00:50:35 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src95_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 22 00:50:35 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src95.csv [Sat Jun 22 00:50:35 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src95_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src95.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Jun 22 00:50:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src95.ximg exists [Sat Jun 22 00:50:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src95_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 22 00:50:42 2013] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src95 appears to have run properly [Sat Jun 22 00:51:37 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 3170.600000, observed total counts = 3175.000000 [Sat Jun 22 00:51:37 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 133 = 1.404352 pixels [Sat Jun 22 00:51:37 2013] 3180.006000 total counts/ 3060.520000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.159829 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 133 = 1.404352 pixels Position = (307.9, 292.3) = 14 42 53.68 -62 39 40.7 Extent = 9.1 (3.7-13.6)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 119.5 +/- 56.4 Background counts = 3060.5 Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.003 [Sat Jun 22 00:51:38 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat Jun 22 00:51:38 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat Jun 22 00:51:38 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound [Sat Jun 22 00:51:38 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Sat Jun 22 00:51:38 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat Jun 22 00:51:38 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9