[Sat Jun 22 00:45:34 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (241.8, 200.1) = 14 43 35.60 -62 46 20.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 139.7 +/- 17.4
  Background counts = 47.1
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.001

[Sat Jun 22 00:45:39 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.23'
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:45 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.54 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:45 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.54"
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:45 2013] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.053
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:45 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 126 for pass 0, mean size = 10.54"
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:50 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:50 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:50 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:50 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:50 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:29 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.54 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:29 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.54"
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:29 2013] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.053
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:29 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 94 for pass 1, mean size = 10.54"
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:35 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src94.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:35 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src94.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:35 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src94_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:35 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src94.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:35 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src94_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src94.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src94.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src94_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:42 2013] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src94 appears to have run properly
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:37 2013] Warning: source 94 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 131 at 14.490259 pixels away
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:38 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:38 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:38 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:38 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:38 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:38 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0