[Sat Jun 22 00:45:33 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (239.9, 311.9) = 14 43 36.61 -62 38 21.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 116.8 +/- 17.8
  Background counts = 112.7
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.001

[Sat Jun 22 00:45:39 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.36'
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:45 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.61 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:45 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.61"
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:45 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.651
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:45 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 111 for pass 0, mean size = 8.61"
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:50 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:50 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:50 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:50 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:50 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:29 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.61 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:29 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.61"
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:29 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.651
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:29 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 82 for pass 1, mean size = 8.61"
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:34 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:34 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:34 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:34 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:34 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src82.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:42 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src82.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:37 2013] Source 116 is offset by -5.029540 and -2.475023 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.989214 x 0.989214, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:38 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:38 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:38 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:38 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:38 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:38 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9