[Sat Jun 22 00:45:32 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (288.8, 322.1) = 14 43 5.77 -62 37 22.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 173.8 +/- 19.4
  Background counts = 149.3
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.002

[Sat Jun 22 00:45:39 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.85'
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:45 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.36 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:45 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.36"
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:45 2013] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.833
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:45 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 100 for pass 0, mean size = 7.36"
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:50 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src100.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:50 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src100.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:50 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src100_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:50 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src100.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:50 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src100_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src100.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:53 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src100.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:53 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src100.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:53 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src100_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:53 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src100.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:53 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src100_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src100.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:50 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 2377.950000, observed total counts = 1932.000000
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:50 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 104
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:50 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:50 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:50 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:50 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:50 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:50 2013] Source is confused with source 105
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:29 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.36 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:29 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.36"
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:29 2013] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.833
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:29 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 73 for pass 1, mean size = 7.36"
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:34 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src73.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:34 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src73.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:34 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src73_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:34 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src73.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:34 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src73_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src73.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:41 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src73.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:41 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src73.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:41 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src73_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:41 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src73.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:41 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src73_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src73.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:37 2013] Warning: source 73 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 104 at 11.116632 pixels away
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:37 2013] Source 104 is offset by -0.988271 and -5.645437 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.969991 x 0.969991, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:37 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 2642.960000, observed total counts = 2624.000000
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:37 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 104 = 1.421232 pixels
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:37 2013] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 73 to 79
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:37 2013] 2600.115700 total counts/ 2552.120000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.950062
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 104 = 1.421232 pixels
  Position = (288.6, 323.5) = 14 43 5.91 -62 37 24.8
  Extent = 6.4 (1.8-13.9)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 48.0 +/- 51.0
  Background counts = 2552.1
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.003
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability