[Sat Jun 22 00:46:01 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (336.3, 227.1) = 14 42 35.70 -62 44 19.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 144.3 +/- 17.9
  Background counts = 129.2
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.002

[Sat Jun 22 00:46:06 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.85'
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:03 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.36 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:03 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.36"
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:03 2013] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.783
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:03 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 41 for pass 0, mean size = 9.36"
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:06 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:06 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:06 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:06 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:06 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:11 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src41.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src41.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:11 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src41_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src41.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:11 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src41_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src41.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:54 2013] Warning, spatial fit 41 centroid is now closest to src. 133
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:54 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 2004.180000, observed total counts = 1696.000000
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:54 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 79
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:54 2013] Warning: source 93 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 79 at 14.670530 pixels away
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:54 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:54 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:54 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:54 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:54 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:54 2013] Source is confused with source 99
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:55 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.36 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:55 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.36"
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:55 2013] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.783
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:55 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 39 for pass 1, mean size = 9.36"
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:57 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src39.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:57 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src39.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:57 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src39_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:57 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src39.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:57 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src39_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src39.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:02 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src39.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src39.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:02 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src39_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src39.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:02 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src39_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src39.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:31 2013] Warning, spatial fit 39 centroid is now closest to src. 16
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:31 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 3014.080000, observed total counts = 2952.000000
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:31 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 79 = 1.229283 pixels
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:31 2013] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 39 to 81
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:31 2013] 2629.972400 total counts/ 2555.860000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.465961
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 79 = 1.229283 pixels
  Position = (336.8, 228.3) = 14 42 35.38 -62 44 19.1
  Extent = 4.7" x 4.7", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 74.1 +/- 51.3
  Background counts = 2555.9
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.003
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability