[Sat Jun 22 00:45:59 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (359.5, 264.2) = 14 42 21.07 -62 41 45.0 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 176.1 +/- 23.9 Background counts = 156.3 Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002 [Sat Jun 22 00:46:06 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.08' [Sat Jun 22 00:48:03 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.97 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Jun 22 00:48:03 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.97" [Sat Jun 22 00:48:03 2013] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.953 [Sat Jun 22 00:48:03 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 44 for pass 0, mean size = 8.97" [Sat Jun 22 00:48:06 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src44.ximg exists [Sat Jun 22 00:48:06 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src44.csv [Sat Jun 22 00:48:06 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src44_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 22 00:48:06 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src44.csv [Sat Jun 22 00:48:06 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src44_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src44.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Jun 22 00:48:11 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src44.ximg exists [Sat Jun 22 00:48:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src44.csv [Sat Jun 22 00:48:11 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src44_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 22 00:48:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src44.csv [Sat Jun 22 00:48:11 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src44_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src44.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Jun 22 00:49:53 2013] Source 61 is offset by -1.021178 and 5.531148 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.079655 x 1.079655, not incorporating fit results [Sat Jun 22 00:49:54 2013] Warning, spatial fit 44 centroid is now closest to src. 92 [Sat Jun 22 00:49:54 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat Jun 22 00:49:54 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat Jun 22 00:49:54 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Sat Jun 22 00:49:54 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Sat Jun 22 00:49:54 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat Jun 22 00:50:55 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.97 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Jun 22 00:50:55 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.97" [Sat Jun 22 00:50:55 2013] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.953 [Sat Jun 22 00:50:55 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 42 for pass 1, mean size = 8.97" [Sat Jun 22 00:50:57 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src42.ximg exists [Sat Jun 22 00:50:57 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src42.csv [Sat Jun 22 00:50:57 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src42_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 22 00:50:57 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src42.csv [Sat Jun 22 00:50:57 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src42_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src42.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Jun 22 00:51:02 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src42.ximg exists [Sat Jun 22 00:51:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src42.csv [Sat Jun 22 00:51:02 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src42_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 22 00:51:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src42.csv [Sat Jun 22 00:51:02 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src42_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src42.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Jun 22 00:52:31 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 2391.060000, observed total counts = 2528.000000 [Sat Jun 22 00:52:31 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 61 = 5.144798 pixels [Sat Jun 22 00:52:31 2013] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 42 to 34 [Sat Jun 22 00:52:31 2013] 2377.041000 total counts/ 2365.680000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.233582 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 61 = 5.144798 pixels Position = (354.7, 262.3) = 14 42 24.10 -62 41 50.9 Extent = 22.4" x 22.4", rotation angle = 321 Source counts = 11.4 +/- 48.8 Background counts = 2365.7 Rate = 0.0007 +/- 0.003 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability