[Sat Jun 22 00:46:05 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (388.6, 280.2) = 14 42 2.74 -62 40 30.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 71.7 +/- 17.5
  Background counts = 103.2
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.001

[Sat Jun 22 00:46:06 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.67'
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:03 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.76 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:03 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.76"
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:03 2013] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.996
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:03 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 91 for pass 0, mean size = 9.76"
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:08 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:08 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:08 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:08 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:08 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:12 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:12 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:12 2013] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91 appears to have run properly
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:53 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 2791.680000, observed total counts = 2007.000000
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:53 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 126
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:53 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 2815.590000, observed total counts = 2049.000000
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:53 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 126
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:54 2013] Warning, spatial fit 91 centroid is now closest to src. 31
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:54 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:54 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:54 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:54 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:54 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:55 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.76 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:55 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.76"
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:55 2013] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.996
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:55 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 84 for pass 1, mean size = 9.76"
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:00 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src84.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:00 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src84_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:00 2013] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src84 appears to have run properly
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:03 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src84.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:03 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src84_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:03 2013] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src84 appears to have run properly
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:31 2013] Source 126 is offset by -6.041285 and -1.872462 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 4.315177 x 4.315177, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:31 2013] Source 126 is offset by -2.993975 and 6.550503 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.151503 x 1.151503, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:31 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:31 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:31 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:31 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:31 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:31 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9