[Sat Jun 22 00:46:04 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (269.5, 321.1) = 14 43 17.94 -62 37 35.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 74.0 +/- 15.2
  Background counts = 47.8
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.001

[Sat Jun 22 00:46:06 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.67'
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:03 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.76 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:03 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.76"
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:03 2013] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.958
[Sat Jun 22 00:48:03 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 104 for pass 0, mean size = 7.76"
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:54 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:54 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:54 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:54 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:54 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:54 2013] Source is confused with source 113
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:54 2013] Source is confused with source 116
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:55 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.76 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:55 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.76"
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:55 2013] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.958
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:55 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 94 for pass 1, mean size = 7.76"
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:00 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src94.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src94.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:00 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src94_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src94.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:00 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src94_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src94.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:04 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src94.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:04 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src94_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:51:04 2013] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src94 appears to have run properly
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:31 2013] Source 111 is offset by 2.146717 and -3.135099 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.899476 x 0.899476, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:31 2013] Source 111 is offset by 2.152176 and -3.121398 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.941586 x 0.941586, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:31 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:31 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:31 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:31 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:31 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:31 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9