[Sat Jun 22 00:45:40 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (491.7, 262.1) = 14 40 57.48 -62 41 51.6 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 730.2 +/- 35.2 Background counts = 93.0 Rate = 0.04 +/- 0.002 [Sat Jun 22 00:45:52 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 14.26' [Sat Jun 22 00:47:53 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.56 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Jun 22 00:47:53 2013] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass [Sat Jun 22 00:47:53 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.56" [Sat Jun 22 00:47:53 2013] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 52, mask sum = 47, frac = 0.898 [Sat Jun 22 00:47:53 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 0, mean size = 13.56" [Sat Jun 22 00:47:54 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg exists [Sat Jun 22 00:47:54 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv [Sat Jun 22 00:47:54 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 22 00:47:54 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv [Sat Jun 22 00:47:54 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Jun 22 00:47:58 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists [Sat Jun 22 00:47:58 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.csv [Sat Jun 22 00:47:58 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 22 00:47:58 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.csv [Sat Jun 22 00:47:58 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Jun 22 00:49:20 2013] Warning, spatial fit 10 centroid is now closest to src. 1 [Sat Jun 22 00:49:20 2013] Source 9 is offset by 1.533908 and -7.378419 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 3.483798 x 3.483798, not incorporating fit results [Sat Jun 22 00:49:21 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat Jun 22 00:49:21 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat Jun 22 00:49:21 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Sat Jun 22 00:49:21 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Sat Jun 22 00:49:21 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat Jun 22 00:50:44 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.56 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Jun 22 00:50:44 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.56" [Sat Jun 22 00:50:44 2013] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 52, mask sum = 47, frac = 0.898 [Sat Jun 22 00:50:44 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 1, mean size = 13.56" [Sat Jun 22 00:50:45 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg exists [Sat Jun 22 00:50:45 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 22 00:50:45 2013] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10 appears to have run properly [Sat Jun 22 00:50:49 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists [Sat Jun 22 00:50:49 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv [Sat Jun 22 00:50:49 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 22 00:50:49 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv [Sat Jun 22 00:50:49 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Jun 22 00:52:03 2013] Warning, spatial fit 10 centroid is now closest to src. 1 [Sat Jun 22 00:52:03 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 17131.500000, observed total counts = 15795.000000 [Sat Jun 22 00:52:03 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 2.111402 pixels [Sat Jun 22 00:52:03 2013] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 10 to 12 [Sat Jun 22 00:52:03 2013] 15505.400000 total counts/ 15505.400000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.000000 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 2.111402 pixels Position = (491.1, 264.1) = 14 40 57.90 -62 41 40.1 Extent = 6.4 (6.4-96.1)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 0.0 +/- 124.5 Background counts = 15505.4 Rate = 6e-21 +/- 0.007 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability