[Sat Jun 22 00:45:43 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (464.2, 422.7) = 14 41 15.55 -62 30 8.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 71.2 +/- 12.3
  Background counts = 19.2
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0007

[Sat Jun 22 00:45:52 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 15.02'
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:53 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.94 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:53 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.94"
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:53 2013] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 54, mask sum = 33, frac = 0.601
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:53 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 110 for pass 0, mean size = 13.94"
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:21 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:21 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:21 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:21 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:21 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:21 2013] Source is confused with source 28
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:44 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.94 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:44 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.94"
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:44 2013] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 54, mask sum = 33, frac = 0.601
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:44 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 97 for pass 1, mean size = 13.94"
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:48 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:48 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:48 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:55 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src97.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:55 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src97.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:55 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src97_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:55 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src97.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:55 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src97_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src97.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:03 2013] Source 40 is offset by -5.804291 and -6.329926 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.565793 x 1.565793, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:03 2013] Warning, spatial fit 97 centroid is now closest to src. 63
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:03 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:03 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:03 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:03 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:03 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:03 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9