[Sat Jun 22 00:45:42 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (365.9, 208.9) = 14 42 16.92 -62 45 43.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 373.6 +/- 28.0
  Background counts = 77.5
  Rate = 0.04 +/- 0.003

[Sat Jun 22 00:45:52 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.13'
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:53 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.49 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:53 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.49"
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:53 2013] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.061
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:53 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 10.49"
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:54 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:54 2013] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:54 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:54 2013] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:54 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:58 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:58 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:47:58 2013] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:20 2013] Source 23 is offset by -1.207653 and -5.983113 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.141264 x 1.141264, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:20 2013] Warning, spatial fit 9 centroid is now closest to src. 25
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:20 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 2364.830000, observed total counts = 2385.000000
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:20 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 23 = 1.278483 pixels
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:20 2013] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 9 to 47
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:20 2013] 2398.584600 total counts/ 2301.400000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.025823
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 23 = 1.278483 pixels
  Position = (367.2, 208.6) = 14 42 16.13 -62 45 44.1
  Extent = 14.6" x 6.9", rotation angle = 340
  Source counts = 97.2 +/- 49.0
  Background counts = 2301.4
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.003
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:21 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:21 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:21 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:21 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:21 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 2.10
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:21 2013] Source is asymmetric
[Sat Jun 22 00:49:21 2013] Source is confused with source 25
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:44 2013] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:44 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.73"
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:44 2013] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.022
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:44 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 10.73"
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:45 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:45 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:45 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:49 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:49 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 22 00:50:49 2013] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:03 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 9312.430000, observed total counts = 9277.000000
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:03 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 23 = 1.097326 pixels
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:03 2013] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 9 to 2
[Sat Jun 22 00:52:03 2013] 8765.184900 total counts/ 8674.030000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.978745
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 23 = 1.097326 pixels
  Position = (366.2, 208.2) = 14 42 16.77 -62 45 45.9
  Extent = 8.0 (5.4-14.1)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 91.2 +/- 93.6
  Background counts = 8674.0
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.005
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability