[Wed Aug 22 21:21:44 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (317.9, 324.0) = 23 23 22.66 58 50 26.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 102848.6 +/- 385.8
  Background counts = 65.0
  Rate = 8 +/- 0.03

[Wed Aug 22 21:21:44 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.33'
[Sat Aug 25 09:15:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.59 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Aug 25 09:15:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.59"
[Sat Aug 25 09:15:23 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.793
[Sat Aug 25 09:15:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 0, mean size = 7.59"
[Sat Aug 25 15:41:35 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 25 15:41:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.csv
[Sat Aug 25 15:41:35 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 25 15:41:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.csv
[Sat Aug 25 15:41:35 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 25 15:41:36 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 25 15:41:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Sat Aug 25 15:41:36 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 25 15:41:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Sat Aug 25 15:41:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 25 15:42:15 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 488424.000000, observed total counts = 298974.000000
[Sat Aug 25 15:42:15 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 2
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Aug 25 15:42:15 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 268053.000000, observed total counts = 224605.000000
[Sat Aug 25 15:42:15 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 2
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Aug 25 15:42:15 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Aug 25 15:42:15 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Aug 25 15:42:15 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Aug 25 15:42:15 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Aug 25 15:42:15 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Aug 25 15:42:15 2012] Source is confused with source 23
[Tue Aug 28 00:23:28 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.59 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Aug 28 00:23:28 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.59"
[Tue Aug 28 00:23:28 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.793
[Tue Aug 28 00:23:28 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 1, mean size = 7.59"
[Tue Aug 28 07:43:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 28 07:43:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.csv
[Tue Aug 28 07:43:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 28 07:43:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.csv
[Tue Aug 28 07:43:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Aug 28 07:43:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 28 07:43:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Tue Aug 28 07:43:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 28 07:43:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Tue Aug 28 07:43:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110010301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Aug 28 07:43:15 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 489771.000000, observed total counts = 298974.000000
[Tue Aug 28 07:43:15 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 2
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Aug 28 07:43:15 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 242723.000000, observed total counts = 224605.000000
[Tue Aug 28 07:43:15 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 2 = 5.545595 pixels
[Tue Aug 28 07:43:15 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 2 to 8
[Tue Aug 28 07:43:15 2012] 231837.000000 total counts/ 25600.000000 bgd. counts: snr = 1288.981250
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 2 = 5.545595 pixels
  Position = (323.4, 322.9) = 23 23 19.62 58 50 21.7
  Extent = 15.5" x 15.5", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 206237.0 +/- 481.5
  Background counts = 25600.0
  Rate = 2e+01 +/- 0.04
[Tue Aug 28 07:43:15 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Aug 28 07:43:15 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Aug 28 07:43:15 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Aug 28 07:43:15 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Aug 28 07:43:15 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00