[Sun Jul 22 10:57:31 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (252.9, 345.0) = 23 24 0.76 58 49 57.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 249.7 +/- 25.7
  Background counts = 105.5
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.001

[Sun Jul 22 10:57:33 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.73'
[Sun Jul 22 11:14:30 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.79 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jul 22 11:14:30 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.79"
[Sun Jul 22 11:14:30 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.983
[Sun Jul 22 11:14:30 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 20 for pass 0, mean size = 8.79"
[Tue Jul 24 13:31:22 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 24 13:31:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.csv
[Tue Jul 24 13:31:22 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 24 13:31:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.csv
[Tue Jul 24 13:31:22 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 24 13:31:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 24 13:31:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.csv
[Tue Jul 24 13:31:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 24 13:31:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.csv
[Tue Jul 24 13:31:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jul 25 18:22:24 2012] Warning, spatial fit 20 centroid is now closest to src. 40
[Wed Jul 25 18:22:24 2012] Source 20 is offset by 2.272839 and -3.217837 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.653582 x 1.653582, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jul 25 18:22:24 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jul 25 18:22:24 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jul 25 18:22:24 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jul 25 18:22:24 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jul 25 18:22:24 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jul 25 18:22:24 2012] Source is confused with source 22
[Wed Jul 25 18:22:54 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.79 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jul 25 18:22:54 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.79"
[Wed Jul 25 18:22:54 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.983
[Wed Jul 25 18:22:54 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 15 for pass 1, mean size = 8.79"
[Thu Jul 26 18:03:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.ximg exists
[Thu Jul 26 18:03:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.csv
[Thu Jul 26 18:03:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jul 26 18:03:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.csv
[Thu Jul 26 18:03:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jul 26 18:03:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.ximg exists
[Thu Jul 26 18:03:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.csv
[Thu Jul 26 18:03:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jul 26 18:03:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.csv
[Thu Jul 26 18:03:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jul 27 04:14:19 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2829.100000, observed total counts = 2494.000000
[Fri Jul 27 04:14:19 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 20
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jul 27 04:14:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jul 27 04:14:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jul 27 04:14:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jul 27 04:14:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jul 27 04:14:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jul 27 04:14:19 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0