[Sun Jul 22 10:58:33 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (223.8, 313.2) = 23 24 16.97 58 47 39.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 73.8 +/- 16.7
  Background counts = 91.1
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.001

[Sun Jul 22 10:58:33 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.51'
[Tue Jul 24 13:31:24 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.18 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 24 13:31:24 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.18"
[Tue Jul 24 13:31:24 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.916
[Tue Jul 24 13:31:24 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 48 for pass 0, mean size = 9.18"
[Tue Jul 24 19:15:57 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src48.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 24 19:15:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src48.csv
[Tue Jul 24 19:15:57 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src48_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 24 19:15:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src48.csv
[Tue Jul 24 19:15:57 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src48_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src48.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 24 19:15:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src48.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 24 19:15:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src48_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 24 19:15:59 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src48 appears to have run properly
[Wed Jul 25 18:22:37 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1475.110000, observed total counts = 1014.000000
[Wed Jul 25 18:22:37 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 69
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jul 25 18:22:37 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1224.850000, observed total counts = 1223.000000
[Wed Jul 25 18:22:37 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 69 = 0.188285 pixels
[Wed Jul 25 18:22:37 2012] 1235.456700 total counts/ 1203.620000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.917663
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 69 = 0.188285 pixels
  Position = (223.7, 313.2) = 23 24 17.07 58 47 38.0
  Extent = 4.9 (2.3-8.8)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 31.8 +/- 35.1
  Background counts = 1203.6
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.002
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability