[Sun Jul 22 10:58:29 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (330.0, 396.8) = 23 23 17.49 58 53 42.3 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 169.2 +/- 23.3 Background counts = 116.0 Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002 [Sun Jul 22 10:58:33 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.49' [Tue Jul 24 13:31:24 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.17 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Jul 24 13:31:24 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.17" [Tue Jul 24 13:31:24 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.117 [Tue Jul 24 13:31:24 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 19 for pass 0, mean size = 10.17" [Tue Jul 24 19:15:56 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.ximg exists [Tue Jul 24 19:15:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.csv [Tue Jul 24 19:15:56 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 24 19:15:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.csv [Tue Jul 24 19:15:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jul 24 19:15:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg exists [Tue Jul 24 19:15:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 24 19:15:58 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19 appears to have run properly [Wed Jul 25 18:22:37 2012] Source 24 is offset by 1.827738 and -0.688829 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.146616 x 1.146616, not incorporating fit results [Wed Jul 25 18:22:37 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2602.950000, observed total counts = 2352.000000 [Wed Jul 25 18:22:37 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 24 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Wed Jul 25 18:22:37 2012] Warning, spatial fit 19 centroid is now closest to src. 8 [Wed Jul 25 18:22:37 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Jul 25 18:22:37 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Jul 25 18:22:37 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Jul 25 18:22:37 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Jul 25 18:22:37 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Jul 25 18:22:37 2012] Source is confused with source 14 [Thu Jul 26 18:03:25 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.17 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu Jul 26 18:03:25 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.17" [Thu Jul 26 18:03:25 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.117 [Thu Jul 26 18:03:25 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 1, mean size = 10.17" [Thu Jul 26 19:29:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg exists [Thu Jul 26 19:29:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg exists [Thu Jul 26 19:29:50 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17 appears to have run properly [Thu Jul 26 19:29:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists [Thu Jul 26 19:29:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists [Thu Jul 26 19:29:50 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17 appears to have run properly [Fri Jul 27 04:14:23 2012] Warning, spatial fit 17 centroid is now closest to src. 10 [Fri Jul 27 04:14:23 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Jul 27 04:14:23 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Jul 27 04:14:23 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Fri Jul 27 04:14:23 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Jul 27 04:14:23 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri Jul 27 04:14:23 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9