[Sun Jul 22 10:58:29 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (294.6, 396.8) = 23 23 37.37 58 53 37.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 163.4 +/- 18.2
  Background counts = 80.4
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.002

[Sun Jul 22 10:58:33 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.14'
[Tue Jul 24 13:31:24 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.00 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 24 13:31:24 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.00"
[Tue Jul 24 13:31:24 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.703
[Tue Jul 24 13:31:24 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 0, mean size = 10.00"
[Tue Jul 24 19:15:56 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 24 19:15:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.csv
[Tue Jul 24 19:15:56 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 24 19:15:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.csv
[Tue Jul 24 19:15:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 24 19:15:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 24 19:15:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Tue Jul 24 19:15:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 24 19:15:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Tue Jul 24 19:15:58 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jul 25 18:22:37 2012] Warning, spatial fit 11 centroid is now closest to src. 11
[Wed Jul 25 18:22:37 2012] Source 19 is offset by -4.751286 and 0.033175 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.477067 x 1.477067, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jul 25 18:22:37 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jul 25 18:22:37 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jul 25 18:22:37 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jul 25 18:22:37 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jul 25 18:22:37 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jul 26 18:03:25 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.00 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jul 26 18:03:25 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.00"
[Thu Jul 26 18:03:25 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.703
[Thu Jul 26 18:03:25 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 1, mean size = 10.00"
[Thu Jul 26 19:29:49 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg exists
[Thu Jul 26 19:29:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Thu Jul 26 19:29:49 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jul 26 19:29:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Thu Jul 26 19:29:49 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jul 26 19:29:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Thu Jul 26 19:29:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Thu Jul 26 19:29:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jul 26 19:29:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Thu Jul 26 19:29:50 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0110010201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jul 27 04:14:23 2012] Source 19 is offset by -3.488550 and -5.989147 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.722281 x 1.722281, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jul 27 04:14:23 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jul 27 04:14:23 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jul 27 04:14:23 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jul 27 04:14:23 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jul 27 04:14:23 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jul 27 04:14:23 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9