[Sun Aug 26 23:10:56 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (327.4, 289.2) = 0 59 19.14 -72 10 11.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 188.1 +/- 17.8
  Background counts = 13.9
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.001

[Sun Aug 26 23:10:56 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.20'
[Mon Aug 27 00:39:47 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.53 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Aug 27 00:39:47 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.53"
[Mon Aug 27 00:39:47 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.004
[Mon Aug 27 00:39:47 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 7.53"
[Mon Aug 27 01:37:28 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 27 01:37:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Mon Aug 27 01:37:28 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 27 01:37:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Mon Aug 27 01:37:28 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Aug 27 01:37:29 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 27 01:37:29 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 27 01:37:29 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0110000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Mon Aug 27 01:37:47 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 963.962000, observed total counts = 897.000000
[Mon Aug 27 01:37:47 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 14 = 3.291337 pixels
[Mon Aug 27 01:37:47 2012] 849.071000 total counts/ 608.828000 bgd. counts: snr = 9.736513
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 14 = 3.291337 pixels
  Position = (330.5, 290.2) = 0 59 16.18 -72 10 5.3
  Extent = 15.1 (15.0-30.1)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 240.2 +/- 29.1
  Background counts = 608.8
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.001
[Mon Aug 27 01:37:47 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Aug 27 01:37:47 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Aug 27 01:37:47 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Mon Aug 27 01:37:47 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Aug 27 01:37:47 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Aug 27 01:37:47 2012] Source is confused with source 16
[Mon Aug 27 01:37:47 2012] Source is confused with source 11
[Mon Aug 27 01:37:47 2012] Source is confused with source 10
[Mon Aug 27 03:21:03 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Aug 27 03:21:03 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Mon Aug 27 03:21:03 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 15.06"
[Mon Aug 27 03:21:03 2012] source mask rpix=3.5, npix_max = 62, mask sum = 50, frac = 0.796
[Mon Aug 27 03:21:03 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 15.06"
[Mon Aug 27 04:21:53 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 27 04:21:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Mon Aug 27 04:21:53 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 27 04:21:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0110000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Mon Aug 27 04:21:53 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0110000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0110000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Aug 27 04:21:54 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 27 04:21:54 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0110000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 27 04:21:54 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0110000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Mon Aug 27 04:22:11 2012] Warning, spatial fit 9 centroid is now closest to src. 10
[Mon Aug 27 04:22:11 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 458.104000, observed total counts = 469.000000
[Mon Aug 27 04:22:11 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 14 = 2.002935 pixels
[Mon Aug 27 04:22:11 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 9 to 28
[Mon Aug 27 04:22:11 2012] 380.249800 total counts/ 352.279000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.490258
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 14 = 2.002935 pixels
  Position = (331.3, 292.1) = 0 59 15.42 -72 9 57.3
  Extent = 5.8 (3.3-11.2)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 28.0 +/- 19.5
  Background counts = 352.3
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.001
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability