[Tue Sep  4 21:38:18 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (304.2, 291.0) = 9 17 57.12 -12 4 9.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 124.7 +/- 25.7
  Background counts = 243.2
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0009

[Tue Sep  4 21:38:18 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.68'
[Tue Sep  4 23:29:18 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.77 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Sep  4 23:29:18 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.77"
[Tue Sep  4 23:29:18 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 16, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.946
[Tue Sep  4 23:29:18 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 25 for pass 0, mean size = 6.77"
[Wed Sep  5 00:30:45 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109980301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 00:30:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109980301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.csv
[Wed Sep  5 00:30:45 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109980301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25_1.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 00:30:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109980301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.csv
[Wed Sep  5 00:30:45 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0109980301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0109980301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Sep  5 00:30:45 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109980301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 00:30:45 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109980301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 00:30:45 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0109980301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25 appears to have run properly
[Wed Sep  5 01:19:39 2012] Source 29 is offset by 3.019571 and 5.191062 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 3.003917 x 3.003917, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Sep  5 01:19:39 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Sep  5 01:19:39 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Sep  5 01:19:39 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Sep  5 01:19:39 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Sep  5 01:19:39 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Sep  5 01:19:39 2012] Source is confused with source 20
[Wed Sep  5 08:49:34 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.77 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Sep  5 08:49:34 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.77"
[Wed Sep  5 08:49:34 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 16, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.946
[Wed Sep  5 08:49:34 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 1, mean size = 6.77"
[Wed Sep  5 10:12:17 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109980301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 10:12:17 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109980301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23_1.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 10:12:17 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0109980301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23 appears to have run properly
[Wed Sep  5 10:12:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109980301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 10:12:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109980301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 10:12:18 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0109980301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23 appears to have run properly
[Wed Sep  5 12:28:40 2012] Source 29 is offset by 3.327939 and 5.191062 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 3.327940 x 3.327940, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Sep  5 12:28:40 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Sep  5 12:28:40 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Sep  5 12:28:40 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Sep  5 12:28:40 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Sep  5 12:28:40 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Sep  5 12:28:40 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9