[Mon Aug 13 21:35:59 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (173.3, 245.1) = 13 35 23.06 37 49 9.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 106.1 +/- 17.2
  Background counts = 103.8
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Mon Aug 13 21:35:59 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.86'
[Mon Aug 13 21:42:30 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.36 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Aug 13 21:42:30 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.36"
[Mon Aug 13 21:42:30 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.517
[Mon Aug 13 21:42:30 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 70 for pass 0, mean size = 11.36"
[Tue Aug 14 00:05:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 14 00:05:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70.csv
[Tue Aug 14 00:05:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 14 00:05:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70.csv
[Tue Aug 14 00:05:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Aug 14 00:05:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src70.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 14 00:05:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src70.csv
[Tue Aug 14 00:05:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src70_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 14 00:05:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src70.csv
[Tue Aug 14 00:05:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src70_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src70.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Aug 14 02:00:33 2012] Warning: source 70 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 74 at 12.352883 pixels away
[Tue Aug 14 02:00:33 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Aug 14 02:00:33 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Aug 14 02:00:33 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Aug 14 02:00:33 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Aug 14 02:00:33 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Aug 14 02:01:02 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.36 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Aug 14 02:01:02 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.36"
[Tue Aug 14 02:01:02 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.517
[Tue Aug 14 02:01:02 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 67 for pass 1, mean size = 11.36"
[Tue Aug 14 03:45:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 14 03:45:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67.csv
[Tue Aug 14 03:45:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 14 03:45:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67.csv
[Tue Aug 14 03:45:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Aug 14 03:45:55 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src67.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 14 03:45:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src67.csv
[Tue Aug 14 03:45:55 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src67_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 14 03:45:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src67.csv
[Tue Aug 14 03:45:55 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src67_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src67.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Aug 14 05:28:45 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 719.070000, observed total counts = 534.000000
[Tue Aug 14 05:28:45 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 74
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Aug 14 05:28:45 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Aug 14 05:28:45 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Aug 14 05:28:45 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Aug 14 05:28:45 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Aug 14 05:28:45 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Aug 14 05:29:16 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(15030.809250, 21274.486328, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Tue Aug 14 05:29:16 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src74_src.reg
[Tue Aug 14 05:29:16 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (136, 208) - (211, 283)
[Tue Aug 14 05:29:16 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(15030.809250, 21274.486328, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17037.261353, 21341.201904, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Tue Aug 14 05:29:16 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src74.gif
[Tue Aug 14 06:42:54 2012] Mean detx,y = (-12627.20, -496.85) 
[Tue Aug 14 06:43:01 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Tue Aug 14 06:43:35 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Tue Aug 14 06:43:36 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src74_src_b10.pi.gz
[Tue Aug 14 06:43:36 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src74_bgd.pi.gz
[Tue Aug 14 08:06:40 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Tue Aug 14 08:06:40 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Tue Aug 14 10:20:12 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Tue Aug 14 10:20:12 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src74_src_b10.pi.gz
[Tue Aug 14 10:20:16 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Tue Aug 14 10:20:16 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00132, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src74.arf
[Tue Aug 14 10:20:16 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Tue Aug 14 10:20:16 2012] Updating source flux to 8.9e-15
[Tue Aug 14 10:26:33 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting