[Mon Aug 13 21:36:33 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (114.2, 280.0) = 13 35 44.82 37 51 41.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 176.6 +/- 19.5
  Background counts = 51.7
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0002

[Mon Aug 13 21:36:34 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.43'
[Tue Aug 14 00:05:27 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.14 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Aug 14 00:05:27 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Tue Aug 14 00:05:27 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.14"
[Tue Aug 14 00:05:27 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 49, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.129
[Tue Aug 14 00:05:27 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 19 for pass 0, mean size = 13.14"
[Tue Aug 14 00:56:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 14 00:56:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.csv
[Tue Aug 14 00:56:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 14 00:56:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.csv
[Tue Aug 14 00:56:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Aug 14 00:56:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 14 00:56:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Tue Aug 14 00:56:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 14 00:56:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Tue Aug 14 00:56:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Aug 14 02:00:39 2012] Warning: source 19 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 5 at 15.982057 pixels away
[Tue Aug 14 02:00:39 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Aug 14 02:00:39 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Aug 14 02:00:39 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Aug 14 02:00:39 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Aug 14 02:00:39 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Aug 14 03:45:55 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.14 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Aug 14 03:45:55 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Tue Aug 14 03:45:55 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.14"
[Tue Aug 14 03:45:55 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 49, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.129
[Tue Aug 14 03:45:55 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 1, mean size = 13.14"
[Tue Aug 14 04:30:45 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 14 04:30:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.csv
[Tue Aug 14 04:30:45 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 14 04:30:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.csv
[Tue Aug 14 04:30:46 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Aug 14 04:30:46 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 14 04:30:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Tue Aug 14 04:30:46 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 14 04:30:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Tue Aug 14 04:30:46 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Aug 14 05:28:50 2012] Warning: source 18 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 5 at 17.211669 pixels away
[Tue Aug 14 05:28:51 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Aug 14 05:28:51 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Aug 14 05:28:51 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Aug 14 05:28:51 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Aug 14 05:28:51 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Aug 14 08:09:42 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(9882.585976, 24311.000854, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Tue Aug 14 08:09:42 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5_src.reg
[Tue Aug 14 08:09:42 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (77, 242) - (152, 317)
[Tue Aug 14 08:09:42 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(9882.585976, 24311.000854, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y)
[Tue Aug 14 08:09:42 2012] Writing fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5.gif
[Tue Aug 14 08:16:23 2012] Mean detx,y = (5907.30, -15728.17) 
[Tue Aug 14 08:16:24 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Tue Aug 14 08:16:43 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Tue Aug 14 08:16:43 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5_src_b10.pi.gz
[Tue Aug 14 08:16:43 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5_bgd.pi.gz
[Tue Aug 14 08:58:54 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Tue Aug 14 08:58:54 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Tue Aug 14 10:20:17 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Tue Aug 14 10:20:17 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5_src_b10.pi.gz
[Tue Aug 14 10:20:19 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Tue Aug 14 10:20:19 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00206, arf fullrun_mos1_xmm0109661001_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5.arf
[Tue Aug 14 10:20:19 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Tue Aug 14 10:20:19 2012] Updating source flux to 6.9e-14
[Tue Aug 14 10:20:29 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting