[Mon Jun 25 10:16:43 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (363.3, 222.1) = 2 23 6.38 -4 16 40.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 59.9 +/- 9.9
  Background counts = 6.8
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0006

[Mon Jun 25 10:16:43 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.26'
[Mon Jun 25 11:36:54 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.06 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 25 11:36:54 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.06"
[Mon Jun 25 11:36:54 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.948
[Mon Jun 25 11:36:54 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 10.06"
[Mon Jun 25 12:22:42 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 25 12:22:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Mon Jun 25 12:22:42 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 25 12:22:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Mon Jun 25 12:22:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 25 12:22:42 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 25 12:22:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Mon Jun 25 12:22:42 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 25 12:22:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Mon Jun 25 12:22:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 25 13:14:11 2012] Warning: source 5 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 26 at 11.856777 pixels away
[Mon Jun 25 13:14:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 25 13:14:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 25 13:14:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 25 13:14:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 25 13:14:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 25 14:24:15 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.06 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 25 14:24:15 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.06"
[Mon Jun 25 14:24:15 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.948
[Mon Jun 25 14:24:15 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 10.06"
[Mon Jun 25 15:10:37 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 25 15:10:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Mon Jun 25 15:10:37 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 25 15:10:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Mon Jun 25 15:10:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 25 15:10:38 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 25 15:10:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Mon Jun 25 15:10:38 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 25 15:10:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Mon Jun 25 15:10:38 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 25 15:57:14 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 112.102000, observed total counts = 97.000000
[Mon Jun 25 15:57:14 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 26
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 25 15:57:14 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 25 15:57:14 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 25 15:57:14 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 25 15:57:14 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 25 15:57:14 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 25 16:52:18 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(31559.881317, 19273.632355, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Mon Jun 25 16:52:18 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src26_src.reg
[Mon Jun 25 16:52:18 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (326, 185) - (401, 260)
[Mon Jun 25 16:52:18 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(31559.881317, 19273.632355, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34122.023215, 16842.399261, 880.361683, 404.049138, 334.589684, X, Y)
[Mon Jun 25 16:52:18 2012] Writing fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src26.gif
[Mon Jun 25 16:54:26 2012] Mean detx,y = (-6198.46, 5890.49) 
[Mon Jun 25 16:54:28 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Mon Jun 25 16:54:50 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Mon Jun 25 16:54:50 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src26_src_b10.pi.gz
[Mon Jun 25 16:54:50 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src26_bgd.pi.gz
[Mon Jun 25 17:07:12 2012] Not generating rmf since there are only 59 counts
[Mon Jun 25 17:07:12 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Mon Jun 25 17:32:40 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Mon Jun 25 17:32:40 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src26_src_b10.pi.gz
[Mon Jun 25 17:32:40 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Mon Jun 25 17:32:40 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00346, arf fullrun_mos1_xmm0109520101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src26.arf
[Mon Jun 25 17:32:40 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Mon Jun 25 17:32:40 2012] Updating source flux to 4.8e-14
[Mon Jun 25 17:32:44 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting