[Thu Jul 19 19:46:15 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (226.7, 408.1) = 16 54 42.14 -41 43 0.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 36.7 +/- 9.1
  Background counts = 15.5
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0003

[Thu Jul 19 19:46:16 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.50'
[Thu Jul 19 23:51:11 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.18 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jul 19 23:51:11 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.18"
[Thu Jul 19 23:51:11 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 37, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.955
[Thu Jul 19 23:51:11 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 88 for pass 0, mean size = 11.18"
[Fri Jul 20 03:17:20 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 20 03:17:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88.csv
[Fri Jul 20 03:17:20 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 20 03:17:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88.csv
[Fri Jul 20 03:17:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jul 20 03:17:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 20 03:17:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88.csv
[Fri Jul 20 03:17:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 20 03:17:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88.csv
[Fri Jul 20 03:17:22 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jul 20 06:26:02 2012] Source 40 is offset by -3.701747 and -8.442494 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.368749 x 1.368749, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jul 20 06:26:02 2012] Warning: source 88 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 40 at 14.106474 pixels away
[Fri Jul 20 06:26:02 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jul 20 06:26:02 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jul 20 06:26:02 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jul 20 06:26:02 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jul 20 06:26:02 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jul 20 06:26:17 2012] Warning, spatial fit 17 centroid is now closest to src. 5
[Fri Jul 20 06:26:17 2012] Warning, spatial fit 22 centroid is now closest to src. 34
[Fri Jul 20 06:26:17 2012] Warning, spatial fit 50 centroid is now closest to src. 43
[Fri Jul 20 11:42:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.18 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jul 20 11:42:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.18"
[Fri Jul 20 11:42:07 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 37, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.955
[Fri Jul 20 11:42:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 77 for pass 1, mean size = 11.18"
[Fri Jul 20 15:21:54 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src77.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 20 15:21:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src77.csv
[Fri Jul 20 15:21:54 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src77_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 20 15:21:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src77.csv
[Fri Jul 20 15:21:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src77_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src77.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jul 20 15:21:56 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src77.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 20 15:21:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src77.csv
[Fri Jul 20 15:21:56 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src77_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 20 15:21:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src77.csv
[Fri Jul 20 15:21:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src77_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0109490401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src77.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jul 20 18:24:11 2012] Warning, spatial fit 64 centroid is now closest to src. 32
[Fri Jul 20 18:24:26 2012] Source 40 is offset by -3.701747 and -8.442494 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.368749 x 1.368749, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jul 20 18:24:26 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 206.085000, observed total counts = 187.000000
[Fri Jul 20 18:24:26 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 40
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jul 20 18:24:26 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jul 20 18:24:26 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jul 20 18:24:26 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jul 20 18:24:26 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jul 20 18:24:26 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jul 20 18:24:26 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0