[Sun Sep  2 18:27:29 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (342.5, 384.5) = 16 53 57.09 -41 44 44.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 59.4 +/- 12.7
  Background counts = 54.1
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0006

[Sun Sep  2 18:27:31 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.01'
[Sun Sep  2 18:31:34 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.93 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Sep  2 18:31:34 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.93"
[Sun Sep  2 18:31:34 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.774
[Sun Sep  2 18:31:34 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 62 for pass 0, mean size = 9.93"
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src62.ximg exists
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src62.csv
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src62_1.ximg exists
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src62.csv
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:27 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src62_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src62.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62.ximg exists
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62.csv
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62_1.ximg exists
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62.csv
[Sun Sep  2 21:54:29 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:22 2012] Warning, spatial fit 62 centroid is now closest to src. 8
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:22 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:22 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:22 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:22 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Sep  3 03:49:22 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Sep  3 03:50:14 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.93 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Sep  3 03:50:14 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.93"
[Mon Sep  3 03:50:14 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.774
[Mon Sep  3 03:50:14 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 60 for pass 1, mean size = 9.93"
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60.csv
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60.csv
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:32 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60.csv
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:32 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60.csv
[Mon Sep  3 06:42:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0109490101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Warning: source 57 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 67 at 10.371202 pixels away
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Source 67 is offset by -8.644180 and 3.483118 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.151172 x 1.151172, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Sep  3 11:19:01 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9